AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Ts 140s ham radio deluxe cw decoder11/7/2022
Having three Yaesu products currently I’m quite familiar with Yaesu’s menus, however I can’t say I really like them.Ī few reviews of the Kenwood TS-590 indicated better performance on CW than the 950. The other mention was Yaesu’s menuing system. A read several reviews about the Yaesu’s multiple roofing filters being not that useful, however they made it a major part of the user interface on the front panel. Two things tipped the scales in Kenwood’s favor. I was torn between the Yaesu 950 and Kenwood TS-590. Is that extra few dB of IMD performance or receiver sensitivity really worth an extra $500 – $1K? I know someone will quip that the Yaesu 950 and Kenwood TS-590 receivers aren’t as good as the K3. It’s not badly designed, but it’s really time Elecraft puts the big boy pants on and makes a die cast chassis. Also, the chassis of the K3 is below what I would consider for a rig in this price class. If you’re like me you’ll want a CW filter, a tighter phone filter, perhaps one to listen to and operate AM, and the general coverage filter band pass unit, and you’re looking at another $580. Right off the bat it’s $2,100 for a 100 watt rig. Yes, it’s a great rig, and initially it looks like a great deal until you start adding on the add-ons you really need to operate this rig. Volumes have been written about the Elecraft K3, and any review below a 5 out of 5 gets dirty looks from the studio audience. And for over a kilobuck, can’t Ten Tec spring for a second antenna connector? This is one of my idiosyncrasies any rig that I have must be able to transmit on whatever bands its capable of transmitting on, and I abhor hardware limited by software. Ts 140s ham radio deluxe cw decoder mod#It bugged me that the MARS mod wasn’t readily available. The simplicity of the Ten Tec Eagle is nice and refreshing, but I just couldn’t bear spending over $1,800 for such a simple rig. You may recall I was debating between a Yaesu 950, Kenwood TS-590, Elecraft K3, and Ten Tec Eagle. Both 'real' CW and the audio kind are legal.Well, I finally broke down and bought a new rig this week. This will result in 'real' CW, but it makes it harder to tune the stations in without practice. Some programs have provisions for external keyers that will read the text you send through a USB interface. You click on the signal in the waterfall that you want to copy/answer. I generally treat CW in FLDIGI as another digital mode, using a soundcard interface. There is absolutely no reason that two no-coders can't use FLDIGI or similar to have QSOs in CW - but your typing has to be faster than the code! Ts 140s ham radio deluxe cw decoder software#When I demo this to my Tech students, I turn the audio off, so I can't cheat!Īnd yes, I have not found any software that works well with hand sent code, with the possible exception of that sent with a bug - still, it's hard to duplicate precise timing without a machine. Spend some time listening to the exchanges before you jump in. Ts 140s ham radio deluxe cw decoder full#They may respond with a partial call, and you need to be able to respond with your full call. DX contests are the easiest, with the shortest exchange, BUT, it helps if you can at least recognize your own callsign, so you know for sure when the DX answered you. You'll need to consult the rules for the contest to understand what that means. Contests generally have very repetitive exchanges making it easier for someone to pick out what's being sent.įor example, a Sweepstakes exchange might look like " W4LAC 121A K0RGR 65 MN". Ts 140s ham radio deluxe cw decoder code#I know some Extras who forgot the code decades ago, and use it to chase DX. Actually, you can use FLDIGI, and it does a good enough job to make lots of CW contacts during contests, where most of the serious operators are using computer-sent CW.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |